version: 1.0.24

rustfmt.toml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+tab_spaces = 2

src/lib.rs

@@ -2,16 +2,26 @@ use pgrx::*;
 
 pg_module_magic!();
 
-use serde_json::{json, Value};
-use std::{collections::HashMap, sync::RwLock};
-use boon::{Compiler, Schemas, ValidationError, SchemaIndex, CompileError};
+use boon::{CompileError, Compiler, ErrorKind, SchemaIndex, Schemas, ValidationError};
 use lazy_static::lazy_static;
+use serde_json::{json, Value};
+use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
+use std::{collections::HashMap, sync::RwLock};
 
 struct BoonCache {
   schemas: Schemas,
   id_to_index: HashMap<String, SchemaIndex>,
 }
 
+// Structure to hold error information without lifetimes
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct Error {
+  path: String,
+  code: String,
+  message: String,
+  cause: String,
+}
+
 lazy_static! {
   static ref SCHEMA_CACHE: RwLock<BoonCache> = RwLock::new(BoonCache {
     schemas: Schemas::new(),
@@ -20,11 +30,17 @@ lazy_static! {
 }
 
 #[pg_extern(strict)]
-fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
+fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB, strict: bool) -> JsonB {
   let mut cache = SCHEMA_CACHE.write().unwrap();
-  let schema_value: Value = schema.0;
+  let mut schema_value: Value = schema.0;
   let schema_path = format!("urn:{}", schema_id);
 
+  // Apply strict validation to all objects in the schema if requested
+  if strict {
+    apply_strict_validation(&mut schema_value);
+  }
+
+  // Create the boon compiler and enable format assertions
   let mut compiler = Compiler::new();
   compiler.enable_format_assertions();
 
@@ -54,9 +70,9 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         CompileError::ValidationError { url: _url, src } => {
           // Collect leaf errors from the meta-schema validation failure
           let mut error_list = Vec::new();
-          collect_validation_errors(src, &mut error_list);
+          collect_errors(src, &mut error_list);
           // Filter and format errors properly - no instance for schema compilation
-          format_drop_errors(error_list, &schema_value)
+          format_errors(error_list, &schema_value)
         }
         _ => {
           // Other compilation errors
@@ -75,10 +91,34 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
   }
 }
 
+// Helper function to recursively apply strict validation to all objects in a schema
+fn apply_strict_validation(schema: &mut Value) {
+  match schema {
+    Value::Object(map) => {
+      // If this is an object type schema, add additionalProperties: false
+      if let Some(Value::String(t)) = map.get("type") {
+        if t == "object" && !map.contains_key("additionalProperties") {
+          map.insert("additionalProperties".to_string(), Value::Bool(false));
+        }
+      }
+      // Recurse into all properties
+      for (_, value) in map.iter_mut() {
+        apply_strict_validation(value);
+      }
+    }
+    Value::Array(arr) => {
+      // Recurse into array items
+      for item in arr.iter_mut() {
+        apply_strict_validation(item);
+      }
+    }
+    _ => {}
+  }
+}
+
 #[pg_extern(strict, parallel_safe)]
 fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
   let cache = SCHEMA_CACHE.read().unwrap();
-
   // Lookup uses the original schema_id
   match cache.id_to_index.get(schema_id) {
     None => JsonB(json!({
@@ -96,10 +136,9 @@ fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         Ok(_) => JsonB(json!({ "response": "success" })),
         Err(validation_error) => {
           let mut error_list = Vec::new();
-          collect_validation_errors(&validation_error, &mut error_list);
-          let errors = format_drop_errors(error_list, &instance_value);
-            
-            JsonB(json!({ "errors": errors }))
+          collect_errors(&validation_error, &mut error_list);
+          let errors = format_errors(error_list, &instance_value);
+          JsonB(json!({ "errors": errors }))
         }
       }
     }
@@ -107,206 +146,244 @@ fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
 }
 
 // Recursively collects validation errors
-fn collect_validation_errors(error: &ValidationError, errors_list: &mut Vec<(String, String, String)>) {
+fn collect_errors(error: &ValidationError, errors_list: &mut Vec<Error>) {
   // Check if this is a structural error that we should skip
-  let error_message = format!("{}", error.kind);
-  let is_structural = error_message == "validation failed" ||
-                     error_message == "allOf failed" ||
-                     error_message == "anyOf failed" ||
-                     error_message == "not failed" ||
-                     error_message.starts_with("oneOf failed");
+  let is_structural = matches!(
+    &error.kind,
+    ErrorKind::Group | ErrorKind::AllOf | ErrorKind::AnyOf | ErrorKind::Not | ErrorKind::OneOf(_)
+  );
 
   if error.causes.is_empty() && !is_structural {
     // This is a leaf error that's not structural
-    // Format just the error kind, not the whole validation error
-    let message = format!("{}", error.kind);
+    let original_message = format!("{}", error.kind);
+    let (error_code, human_message) = convert_error_kind(&error.kind);
 
-    errors_list.push((
-      error.instance_location.to_string(),
-      error.schema_url.to_string(),
-      message
-    ));
+    errors_list.push(Error {
+      path: error.instance_location.to_string(),
+      code: error_code,
+      message: human_message,
+      cause: original_message,
+    });
   } else {
     // Recurse into causes
     for cause in &error.causes {
-      collect_validation_errors(cause, errors_list);
+      collect_errors(cause, errors_list);
     }
   }
 }
 
+// Convert ErrorKind to error code and human message
+fn convert_error_kind(kind: &ErrorKind) -> (String, String) {
+  match kind {
+    ErrorKind::Type { .. } => (
+      "TYPE_MISMATCH".to_string(),
+      "Field type does not match the expected type".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Required { .. } => (
+      "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING".to_string(),
+      "Required field is missing".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::DependentRequired { .. } => (
+      "DEPENDENT_REQUIRED_MISSING".to_string(),
+      "Dependent required fields are missing".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Dependency { .. } => (
+      "DEPENDENCY_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Dependency requirement not met".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Enum { .. } => (
+      "ENUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is not one of the allowed options".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Const { .. } => (
+      "CONST_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match the required constant".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinLength { .. } => (
+      "MIN_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Field length is below the minimum required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxLength { .. } => (
+      "MAX_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Field length exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Pattern { .. } => (
+      "PATTERN_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match the required pattern".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Minimum { .. } => (
+      "MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is below the minimum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Maximum { .. } => (
+      "MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ExclusiveMinimum { .. } => (
+      "EXCLUSIVE_MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must be greater than the minimum".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ExclusiveMaximum { .. } => (
+      "EXCLUSIVE_MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must be less than the maximum".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MultipleOf { .. } => (
+      "MULTIPLE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is not a multiple of the required factor".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinItems { .. } => (
+      "MIN_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array has fewer items than required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxItems { .. } => (
+      "MAX_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array has more items than allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::UniqueItems { .. } => (
+      "UNIQUE_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array contains duplicate items".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinProperties { .. } => (
+      "MIN_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Object has fewer properties than required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxProperties { .. } => (
+      "MAX_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Object has more properties than allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AdditionalProperties { .. } => (
+      "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(),
+      "Object contains properties that are not allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AdditionalItems { .. } => (
+      "ADDITIONAL_ITEMS_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(),
+      "Array contains additional items that are not allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Format { want, .. } => (
+      "FORMAT_INVALID".to_string(),
+      format!("Invalid {} format", want),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::PropertyName { .. } => (
+      "INVALID_PROPERTY_NAME".to_string(),
+      "Property name is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Contains => (
+      "CONTAINS_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "No items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinContains { .. } => (
+      "MIN_CONTAINS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Too few items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxContains { .. } => (
+      "MAX_CONTAINS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Too many items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentEncoding { .. } => (
+      "CONTENT_ENCODING_INVALID".to_string(),
+      "Content encoding is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentMediaType { .. } => (
+      "CONTENT_MEDIA_TYPE_INVALID".to_string(),
+      "Content media type is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::FalseSchema => (
+      "FALSE_SCHEMA".to_string(),
+      "Schema validation always fails".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Not => (
+      "NOT_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value matched a schema it should not match".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::RefCycle { .. } => (
+      "REFERENCE_CYCLE".to_string(),
+      "Schema contains a reference cycle".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Reference { .. } => (
+      "REFERENCE_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Reference validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Schema { .. } => (
+      "SCHEMA_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Schema validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentSchema => (
+      "CONTENT_SCHEMA_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Content schema validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    // These shouldn't appear as leaf errors due to is_structural check
+    ErrorKind::Group => (
+      "VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AllOf => (
+      "ALL_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match all required schemas".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AnyOf => (
+      "ANY_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match any of the allowed schemas".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::OneOf(_) => (
+      "ONE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must match exactly one schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+  }
+}
+
 // Formats errors according to DropError structure
-fn format_drop_errors(raw_errors: Vec<(String, String, String)>, instance: &Value) -> Vec<Value> {
-    use std::collections::HashMap;
-    use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
-
-    // We don't filter structural paths from instance paths anymore
-    // because instance paths shouldn't contain these segments anyway
-    // The issue was likely with schema paths, not instance paths
-    let plausible_errors = raw_errors;
-
-    // 2. Deduplicate by instance_path and format as DropError
-    let mut unique_errors: HashMap<String, Value> = HashMap::new();
-    for (instance_path, schema_path, message) in plausible_errors {
-        if let Entry::Vacant(entry) = unique_errors.entry(instance_path.clone()) {
-            // Convert message to error code and make it human readable
-            let (code, human_message) = enhance_error_message(&message);
-            
-            // Extract the failing value from the instance
-            let failing_value = extract_value_at_path(instance, &instance_path);
-            
-            entry.insert(json!({
-                "code": code,
-                "message": human_message,
-                "details": {
-                    "path": schema_path,
-                    "context": json!({ 
-                        "instance_path": instance_path,
-                        "failing_value": failing_value
-                    }),
-                    "cause": message // Original error message
-                }
-            }));
-        }
+fn format_errors(errors: Vec<Error>, instance: &Value) -> Vec<Value> {
+  // Deduplicate by instance_path and format as DropError
+  let mut unique_errors: HashMap<String, Value> = HashMap::new();
+  for error in errors {
+    if let Entry::Vacant(entry) = unique_errors.entry(error.path.clone()) {
+      // Extract the failing value from the instance
+      let failing_value = extract_value_at_path(instance, &error.path);
+      entry.insert(json!({
+          "code": error.code,
+          "message": error.message,
+          "details": {
+              "path": error.path,
+              "context": failing_value,
+              "cause": error.cause
+          }
+      }));
     }
+  }
 
-    unique_errors.into_values().collect()
+  unique_errors.into_values().collect()
 }
 
 // Helper function to extract value at a JSON pointer path
 fn extract_value_at_path(instance: &Value, path: &str) -> Value {
-    let parts: Vec<&str> = path.split('/').filter(|s| !s.is_empty()).collect();
-    let mut current = instance;
+  let parts: Vec<&str> = path.split('/').filter(|s| !s.is_empty()).collect();
+  let mut current = instance;
 
-    for part in parts {
-        match current {
-            Value::Object(map) => {
-                if let Some(value) = map.get(part) {
-                    current = value;
-                } else {
-                    return Value::Null;
-                }
-            }
-            Value::Array(arr) => {
-                if let Ok(index) = part.parse::<usize>() {
-                    if let Some(value) = arr.get(index) {
-                        current = value;
-                    } else {
-                        return Value::Null;
-                    }
-                } else {
-                    return Value::Null;
-                }
-            }
-            _ => return Value::Null,
+  for part in parts {
+    match current {
+      Value::Object(map) => {
+        if let Some(value) = map.get(part) {
+          current = value;
+        } else {
+          return Value::Null;
         }
+      }
+      Value::Array(arr) => {
+        if let Ok(index) = part.parse::<usize>() {
+          if let Some(value) = arr.get(index) {
+            current = value;
+          } else {
+            return Value::Null;
+          }
+        } else {
+          return Value::Null;
+        }
+      }
+      _ => return Value::Null,
     }
+  }
 
-    current.clone()
-}
-
-// Helper to convert validation messages to error codes and human-readable messages
-fn enhance_error_message(message: &str) -> (String, String) {
-    // Match exact boon error message patterns
-    let trimmed = message.trim();
-    
-    if trimmed.contains("value must be one of") {
-        ("ENUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is not one of the allowed options".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("length must be >=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MIN_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Field length is below the minimum required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("length must be <=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MAX_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Field length exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be >=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is below the minimum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be <=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be >") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("EXCLUSIVE_MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must be greater than the minimum".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be <") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("EXCLUSIVE_MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must be less than the maximum".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("does not match pattern") {
-        ("PATTERN_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match the required pattern".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("missing properties") {
-        ("REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING".to_string(), 
-         "Required field is missing".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("want") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("TYPE_MISMATCH".to_string(), 
-         "Field type does not match the expected type".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.starts_with("value must be") && !trimmed.contains("one of") {
-        ("CONST_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match the required constant".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("is not valid") && trimmed.contains(":") {
-        ("FORMAT_INVALID".to_string(), 
-         extract_format_message(trimmed))
-    } else if trimmed.contains("items at") && trimmed.contains("are equal") {
-        ("UNIQUE_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array contains duplicate items".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("additionalProperties") && trimmed.contains("not allowed") {
-        ("ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(), 
-         "Object contains properties that are not allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("is not multipleOf") {
-        ("MULTIPLE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is not a multiple of the required factor".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("minimum") && trimmed.contains("properties required") {
-        ("MIN_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Object has fewer properties than required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("maximum") && trimmed.contains("properties required") {
-        ("MAX_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Object has more properties than allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("minimum") && trimmed.contains("items required") {
-        ("MIN_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array has fewer items than required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("maximum") && trimmed.contains("items required") {
-        ("MAX_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array has more items than allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "false schema" {
-        ("FALSE_SCHEMA".to_string(), 
-         "Schema validation always fails".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "not failed" {
-        ("NOT_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value matched a schema it should not match".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "allOf failed" {
-        ("ALL_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match all required schemas".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "anyOf failed" {
-        ("ANY_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match any of the allowed schemas".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("oneOf failed") {
-        ("ONE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must match exactly one schema".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "validation failed" {
-        ("VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(), 
-         "Validation failed".to_string())
-    } else {
-        // For any unmatched patterns, try to provide a generic human-readable message
-        // while preserving the original error in details.cause
-        ("VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(), 
-         "Validation failed".to_string())
-    }
-}
-
-
-
-// Extract a better format message
-fn extract_format_message(message: &str) -> String {
-    if message.contains("date-time") {
-        "Invalid date-time format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("email") {
-        "Invalid email format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("uri") {
-        "Invalid URI format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("uuid") {
-        "Invalid UUID format".to_string()
-    } else {
-        "Invalid format".to_string()
-    }
+  current.clone()
 }
 
 #[pg_extern(strict, parallel_safe)]
@@ -347,7 +424,6 @@ pub mod pg_test {
   }
 }
 
-
 #[cfg(any(test, feature = "pg_test"))]
 #[pg_schema]
 mod tests {

src/tests.rs

@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ fn test_cache_and_validate_json_schema() {
   let invalid_instance_type = json!({ "name": "Bob", "age": -5 });
   let invalid_instance_missing = json!({ "name": "Charlie" });
 
-  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema.clone()));
+  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema.clone()), false);
   assert_success_with_json!(cache_result, "Cache operation should succeed.");
 
   let valid_result = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(valid_instance));
@@ -153,16 +153,15 @@ fn test_cache_and_validate_json_schema() {
   let invalid_result_type = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_instance_type));
   assert_failure_with_json!(invalid_result_type, 1, "Value is below the minimum allowed", "Validation with invalid type should fail.");
   let errors_type = invalid_result_type.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
-  assert_eq!(errors_type[0]["details"]["context"]["instance_path"], "/age");
-  assert_eq!(errors_type[0]["details"]["path"], "urn:my_schema#/properties/age");
+  assert_eq!(errors_type[0]["details"]["path"], "/age");
+  assert_eq!(errors_type[0]["details"]["context"], -5);
   assert_eq!(errors_type[0]["code"], "MINIMUM_VIOLATED");
 
   // Missing field
   let invalid_result_missing = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_instance_missing));
   assert_failure_with_json!(invalid_result_missing, 1, "Required field is missing", "Validation with missing field should fail.");
   let errors_missing = invalid_result_missing.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
-  assert_eq!(errors_missing[0]["details"]["context"]["instance_path"], "");
-  assert_eq!(errors_missing[0]["details"]["path"], "urn:my_schema#");
+  assert_eq!(errors_missing[0]["details"]["path"], "");
   assert_eq!(errors_missing[0]["code"], "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING");
 
   // Schema not found
@@ -191,7 +190,7 @@ fn test_cache_invalid_json_schema() {
     "type": ["invalid_type_value"] 
   });
 
-  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_schema));
+  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_schema), false);
 
   // Expect 2 leaf errors because the meta-schema validation fails at the type value
   // and within the type array itself.
@@ -208,9 +207,9 @@ fn test_cache_invalid_json_schema() {
   // Both errors should have ENUM_VIOLATED code
   assert_eq!(errors_array[0]["code"], "ENUM_VIOLATED");
   assert_eq!(errors_array[1]["code"], "ENUM_VIOLATED");
-  // Check instance paths are preserved in context
+  // Check instance paths are preserved in path field
   let paths: Vec<&str> = errors_array.iter()
-    .map(|e| e["details"]["context"]["instance_path"].as_str().unwrap())
+    .map(|e| e["details"]["path"].as_str().unwrap())
     .collect();
   assert!(paths.contains(&"/type"));
   assert!(paths.contains(&"/type/0"));
@@ -234,7 +233,7 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_detailed_validation_errors() {
     },
     "required": ["address"]
   });
-  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema));
+  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema), false);
 
   let invalid_instance = json!({
     "address": {
@@ -273,7 +272,7 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_oneof_validation_errors() {
     ]
   });
 
-  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema));
+  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema), false);
 
   // --- Test case 1: Fails string maxLength (in branch 0) AND missing number_prop (in branch 1) ---
   let invalid_string_instance = json!({ "string_prop": "toolongstring" });
@@ -283,11 +282,11 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_oneof_validation_errors() {
   // Explicitly check that both expected errors are present, ignoring order
   let errors_string = result_invalid_string.0["errors"].as_array().expect("Expected error array for invalid string");
   assert!(errors_string.iter().any(|e| 
-    e["details"]["context"]["instance_path"] == "/string_prop" && 
+    e["details"]["path"] == "/string_prop" && 
     e["code"] == "MAX_LENGTH_VIOLATED"
   ), "Missing maxLength error");
   assert!(errors_string.iter().any(|e| 
-    e["details"]["context"]["instance_path"] == "" && 
+    e["details"]["path"] == "" && 
     e["code"] == "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING"
   ), "Missing number_prop required error");
 
@@ -299,11 +298,11 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_oneof_validation_errors() {
   // Explicitly check that both expected errors are present, ignoring order
   let errors_number = result_invalid_number.0["errors"].as_array().expect("Expected error array for invalid number");
   assert!(errors_number.iter().any(|e| 
-    e["details"]["context"]["instance_path"] == "/number_prop" && 
+    e["details"]["path"] == "/number_prop" && 
     e["code"] == "MINIMUM_VIOLATED"
   ), "Missing minimum error");
   assert!(errors_number.iter().any(|e| 
-    e["details"]["context"]["instance_path"] == "" && 
+    e["details"]["path"] == "" && 
     e["code"] == "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING"
   ), "Missing string_prop required error");
 
@@ -317,7 +316,7 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_oneof_validation_errors() {
   let errors_bool = result_invalid_bool.0["errors"].as_array().expect("Expected error array for invalid bool");
   assert_eq!(errors_bool.len(), 1, "Expected exactly one error after deduplication");
   assert_eq!(errors_bool[0]["code"], "TYPE_MISMATCH");
-  assert_eq!(errors_bool[0]["details"]["context"]["instance_path"], "");
+  assert_eq!(errors_bool[0]["details"]["path"], "");
 
   // --- Test case 4: Fails missing required for both branches ---
   // Input: empty object, expected string_prop (branch 0) OR number_prop (branch 1)
@@ -329,7 +328,7 @@ fn test_validate_json_schema_oneof_validation_errors() {
   let errors_empty = result_empty_obj.0["errors"].as_array().expect("Expected error array for empty object");
   assert_eq!(errors_empty.len(), 1, "Expected exactly one error after filtering empty object");
   assert_eq!(errors_empty[0]["code"], "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING");
-  assert_eq!(errors_empty[0]["details"]["context"]["instance_path"], "");
+  assert_eq!(errors_empty[0]["details"]["path"], "");
   // The human message should be generic
   assert_eq!(errors_empty[0]["message"], "Required field is missing");
 }
@@ -341,7 +340,7 @@ fn test_clear_json_schemas() {
   
   let schema_id = "schema_to_clear";
   let schema = json!({ "type": "string" });
-  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema.clone()));
+  let cache_result = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema.clone()), false);
   assert_success_with_json!(cache_result);
 
   let show_result1 = show_json_schemas(); 
@@ -367,8 +366,8 @@ fn test_show_json_schemas() {
   let schema_id2 = "schema2";
   let schema = json!({ "type": "boolean" });
 
-  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id1, jsonb(schema.clone()));
-  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id2, jsonb(schema.clone()));
+  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id1, jsonb(schema.clone()), false);
+  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id2, jsonb(schema.clone()), false);
 
   let result = show_json_schemas();
   let schemas = result.0["response"].as_array().unwrap();
@@ -376,3 +375,167 @@ fn test_show_json_schemas() {
   assert!(schemas.contains(&json!(schema_id1)));
   assert!(schemas.contains(&json!(schema_id2)));
 }
+
+#[pg_test]
+fn test_auto_strict_validation() {
+  clear_json_schemas();
+  let schema_id = "strict_test";
+  let schema_id_non_strict = "non_strict_test";
+  
+  // Schema without explicit additionalProperties: false
+  let schema = json!({
+    "type": "object",
+    "properties": {
+      "name": { "type": "string" },
+      "profile": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "properties": {
+          "age": { "type": "number" },
+          "preferences": {
+            "type": "object",
+            "properties": {
+              "theme": { "type": "string" }
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "tags": {
+        "type": "array",
+        "items": {
+          "type": "object",
+          "properties": {
+            "id": { "type": "string" },
+            "value": { "type": "string" }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  });
+  
+  // Cache the same schema twice - once with strict=true, once with strict=false
+  let cache_result_strict = cache_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(schema.clone()), true);
+  assert_success_with_json!(cache_result_strict, "Schema caching with strict=true should succeed");
+  
+  let cache_result_non_strict = cache_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(schema.clone()), false);
+  assert_success_with_json!(cache_result_non_strict, "Schema caching with strict=false should succeed");
+  
+  // Test 1: Valid instance with no extra properties (should pass for both)
+  let valid_instance = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "profile": {
+      "age": 30,
+      "preferences": {
+        "theme": "dark"
+      }
+    },
+    "tags": [
+      {"id": "1", "value": "rust"},
+      {"id": "2", "value": "postgres"}
+    ]
+  });
+  
+  let valid_result_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(valid_instance.clone()));
+  assert_success_with_json!(valid_result_strict, "Valid instance should pass with strict schema");
+  
+  let valid_result_non_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(valid_instance));
+  assert_success_with_json!(valid_result_non_strict, "Valid instance should pass with non-strict schema");
+  
+  // Test 2: Root level extra property
+  let invalid_root_extra = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "extraField": "should fail"  // Extra property at root
+  });
+  
+  // Should fail with strict schema
+  let result_root_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_root_extra.clone()));
+  assert_failure_with_json!(result_root_strict, 1, "Object contains properties that are not allowed");
+  let errors_root = result_root_strict.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
+  assert_eq!(errors_root[0]["code"], "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED");
+  assert_eq!(errors_root[0]["details"]["path"], "");
+  
+  // Should pass with non-strict schema
+  let result_root_non_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(invalid_root_extra));
+  assert_success_with_json!(result_root_non_strict, "Extra property should be allowed with non-strict schema");
+  
+  // Test 3: Nested object extra property
+  let invalid_nested_extra = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "profile": {
+      "age": 30,
+      "extraNested": "should fail"  // Extra property in nested object
+    }
+  });
+  
+  // Should fail with strict schema
+  let result_nested_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_nested_extra.clone()));
+  assert_failure_with_json!(result_nested_strict, 1, "Object contains properties that are not allowed");
+  let errors_nested = result_nested_strict.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
+  assert_eq!(errors_nested[0]["code"], "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED");
+  assert_eq!(errors_nested[0]["details"]["path"], "/profile");
+  
+  // Should pass with non-strict schema
+  let result_nested_non_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(invalid_nested_extra));
+  assert_success_with_json!(result_nested_non_strict, "Extra nested property should be allowed with non-strict schema");
+  
+  // Test 4: Deeply nested object extra property
+  let invalid_deep_extra = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "profile": {
+      "age": 30,
+      "preferences": {
+        "theme": "dark",
+        "extraDeep": "should fail"  // Extra property in deeply nested object
+      }
+    }
+  });
+  
+  // Should fail with strict schema
+  let result_deep_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_deep_extra.clone()));
+  assert_failure_with_json!(result_deep_strict, 1, "Object contains properties that are not allowed");
+  let errors_deep = result_deep_strict.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
+  assert_eq!(errors_deep[0]["code"], "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED");
+  assert_eq!(errors_deep[0]["details"]["path"], "/profile/preferences");
+  
+  // Should pass with non-strict schema
+  let result_deep_non_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(invalid_deep_extra));
+  assert_success_with_json!(result_deep_non_strict, "Extra deep property should be allowed with non-strict schema");
+  
+  // Test 5: Array item extra property
+  let invalid_array_item_extra = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "tags": [
+      {"id": "1", "value": "rust", "extraInArray": "should fail"}  // Extra property in array item
+    ]
+  });
+  
+  // Should fail with strict schema
+  let result_array_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id, jsonb(invalid_array_item_extra.clone()));
+  assert_failure_with_json!(result_array_strict, 1, "Object contains properties that are not allowed");
+  let errors_array = result_array_strict.0["errors"].as_array().unwrap();
+  assert_eq!(errors_array[0]["code"], "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED");
+  assert_eq!(errors_array[0]["details"]["path"], "/tags/0");
+  
+  // Should pass with non-strict schema
+  let result_array_non_strict = validate_json_schema(schema_id_non_strict, jsonb(invalid_array_item_extra));
+  assert_success_with_json!(result_array_non_strict, "Extra array item property should be allowed with non-strict schema");
+  
+  // Test 6: Schema with explicit additionalProperties: true should allow extras even with strict=true
+  let schema_id_permissive = "permissive_test";
+  let permissive_schema = json!({
+    "type": "object",
+    "properties": {
+      "name": { "type": "string" }
+    },
+    "additionalProperties": true  // Explicitly allow additional properties
+  });
+  
+  let _ = cache_json_schema(schema_id_permissive, jsonb(permissive_schema), true); // Note: strict=true
+  
+  let instance_with_extra = json!({
+    "name": "John",
+    "extraAllowed": "should pass"
+  });
+  
+  let result_permissive = validate_json_schema(schema_id_permissive, jsonb(instance_with_extra));
+  assert_success_with_json!(result_permissive, "Instance with extra property should pass when additionalProperties is explicitly true, even with strict=true");
+}

version

@@ -1 +1 @@
-1.0.21
+1.0.24