version: 1.0.28

rustfmt.toml

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+tab_spaces = 2

src/lib.rs

@@ -2,16 +2,26 @@ use pgrx::*;
 
 pg_module_magic!();
 
-use serde_json::{json, Value};
+use boon::{CompileError, Compiler, ErrorKind, SchemaIndex, Schemas, ValidationError};
-use std::{collections::HashMap, sync::RwLock};
-use boon::{Compiler, Schemas, ValidationError, SchemaIndex, CompileError};
 use lazy_static::lazy_static;
+use serde_json::{json, Value};
+use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
+use std::{collections::HashMap, sync::RwLock};
 
 struct BoonCache {
   schemas: Schemas,
   id_to_index: HashMap<String, SchemaIndex>,
 }
 
+// Structure to hold error information without lifetimes
+#[derive(Debug)]
+struct Error {
+  path: String,
+  code: String,
+  message: String,
+  cause: String,
+}
+
 lazy_static! {
   static ref SCHEMA_CACHE: RwLock<BoonCache> = RwLock::new(BoonCache {
     schemas: Schemas::new(),
@@ -20,11 +30,17 @@ lazy_static! {
 }
 
 #[pg_extern(strict)]
-fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
+fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB, strict: bool) -> JsonB {
   let mut cache = SCHEMA_CACHE.write().unwrap();
-  let schema_value: Value = schema.0;
+  let mut schema_value: Value = schema.0;
   let schema_path = format!("urn:{}", schema_id);
 
+  // Apply strict validation to all objects in the schema if requested
+  if strict {
+    apply_strict_validation(&mut schema_value);
+  }
+
+  // Create the boon compiler and enable format assertions
   let mut compiler = Compiler::new();
   compiler.enable_format_assertions();
 
@@ -35,7 +51,7 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         "code": "SCHEMA_RESOURCE_ADD_FAILED",
         "message": format!("Failed to add schema resource '{}'", schema_id),
         "details": {
-          "path": schema_path,
+          "schema": schema_id,
           "cause": format!("{}", e)
         }
       }]
@@ -54,9 +70,9 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         CompileError::ValidationError { url: _url, src } => {
           // Collect leaf errors from the meta-schema validation failure
           let mut error_list = Vec::new();
-          collect_validation_errors(src, &mut error_list);
+          collect_errors(src, &mut error_list);
           // Filter and format errors properly - no instance for schema compilation
-          format_drop_errors(error_list, &schema_value)
+          format_errors(error_list, &schema_value, schema_id)
         }
         _ => {
           // Other compilation errors
@@ -64,7 +80,7 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
             "code": "SCHEMA_COMPILATION_FAILED",
             "message": format!("Schema '{}' compilation failed", schema_id),
             "details": {
-              "path": schema_path,
+              "schema": schema_id,
               "cause": format!("{:?}", e)
             }
           })]
@@ -75,10 +91,49 @@ fn cache_json_schema(schema_id: &str, schema: JsonB) -> JsonB {
   }
 }
 
+// Helper function to apply strict validation to a schema
+// 
+// This recursively adds unevaluatedProperties: false to object-type schemas,
+// but SKIPS schemas inside if/then/else to avoid breaking conditional validation.
+fn apply_strict_validation(schema: &mut Value) {
+  apply_strict_validation_recursive(schema, false);
+}
+
+fn apply_strict_validation_recursive(schema: &mut Value, inside_conditional: bool) {
+  match schema {
+    Value::Object(map) => {
+      // Skip adding strict validation if we're inside a conditional
+      if !inside_conditional {
+        // Add strict validation to object schemas only at top level
+        if let Some(Value::String(t)) = map.get("type") {
+          if t == "object" && !map.contains_key("unevaluatedProperties") && !map.contains_key("additionalProperties") {
+            // At top level, use unevaluatedProperties: false
+            // This considers all evaluated properties from all schemas
+            map.insert("unevaluatedProperties".to_string(), Value::Bool(false));
+          }
+        }
+      }
+      
+      // Recurse into all properties
+      for (key, value) in map.iter_mut() {
+        // Mark when we're inside conditional branches
+        let in_conditional = inside_conditional || matches!(key.as_str(), "if" | "then" | "else");
+        apply_strict_validation_recursive(value, in_conditional);
+      }
+    }
+    Value::Array(arr) => {
+      // Recurse into array items  
+      for item in arr.iter_mut() {
+        apply_strict_validation_recursive(item, inside_conditional);
+      }
+    }
+    _ => {}
+  }
+}
+
 #[pg_extern(strict, parallel_safe)]
 fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
   let cache = SCHEMA_CACHE.read().unwrap();
-
   // Lookup uses the original schema_id
   match cache.id_to_index.get(schema_id) {
     None => JsonB(json!({
@@ -86,6 +141,7 @@ fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         "code": "SCHEMA_NOT_FOUND",
         "message": format!("Schema '{}' not found in cache", schema_id),
         "details": {
+          "schema": schema_id,
           "cause": "Schema must be cached before validation"
         }
       }]
@@ -96,10 +152,11 @@ fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
         Ok(_) => JsonB(json!({ "response": "success" })),
         Err(validation_error) => {
           let mut error_list = Vec::new();
-          collect_validation_errors(&validation_error, &mut error_list);
+          collect_errors(&validation_error, &mut error_list);
-          let errors = format_drop_errors(error_list, &instance_value);
+          let errors = format_errors(error_list, &instance_value, schema_id);
-            
+          // Filter out FALSE_SCHEMA errors if there are other validation errors
-            JsonB(json!({ "errors": errors }))
+          let filtered_errors = filter_false_schema_errors(errors);
+          JsonB(json!({ "errors": filtered_errors }))
         }
       }
     }
@@ -107,206 +164,370 @@ fn validate_json_schema(schema_id: &str, instance: JsonB) -> JsonB {
 }
 
 // Recursively collects validation errors
-fn collect_validation_errors(error: &ValidationError, errors_list: &mut Vec<(String, String, String)>) {
+fn collect_errors(error: &ValidationError, errors_list: &mut Vec<Error>) {
   // Check if this is a structural error that we should skip
-  let error_message = format!("{}", error.kind);
+  let is_structural = matches!(
-  let is_structural = error_message == "validation failed" ||
+    &error.kind,
-                     error_message == "allOf failed" ||
+    ErrorKind::Group | ErrorKind::AllOf | ErrorKind::AnyOf | ErrorKind::Not | ErrorKind::OneOf(_)
-                     error_message == "anyOf failed" ||
+  );
-                     error_message == "not failed" ||
-                     error_message.starts_with("oneOf failed");
-  
-  if error.causes.is_empty() && !is_structural {
-    // This is a leaf error that's not structural
-    // Format just the error kind, not the whole validation error
-    let message = format!("{}", error.kind);
 
-    errors_list.push((
+  // Special handling for FalseSchema - if it has causes, use those instead
-      error.instance_location.to_string(),
+  if matches!(&error.kind, ErrorKind::FalseSchema) {
-      error.schema_url.to_string(),
+    if !error.causes.is_empty() {
-      message
+      // FalseSchema often wraps more specific errors in if/then conditionals
-    ));
+      for cause in &error.causes {
+        collect_errors(cause, errors_list);
+      }
+      return;
+    }
+    // If FalseSchema has no causes, it's likely from unevaluatedProperties
+    // We'll handle it as a leaf error below
+  }
+
+  if error.causes.is_empty() && !is_structural {
+    // Handle errors with multiple fields specially
+    match &error.kind {
+      ErrorKind::Required { want } => {
+        // Create a separate error for each missing required field
+        let base_path = error.instance_location.to_string();
+        for missing_field in want {
+          let field_path = if base_path.is_empty() {
+            format!("/{}", missing_field)
+          } else {
+            format!("{}/{}", base_path, missing_field)
+          };
+          
+          errors_list.push(Error {
+            path: field_path,
+            code: "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING".to_string(),
+            message: format!("Required field '{}' is missing", missing_field),
+            cause: format!("property '{}' is required", missing_field),
+          });
+        }
+      }
+      ErrorKind::Dependency { prop, missing } | ErrorKind::DependentRequired { prop, missing } => {
+        // Create a separate error for each missing field
+        let base_path = error.instance_location.to_string();
+        for missing_field in missing {
+          let field_path = if base_path.is_empty() {
+            format!("/{}", missing_field)
+          } else {
+            format!("{}/{}", base_path, missing_field)
+          };
+          
+          let (error_code, human_message) = match &error.kind {
+            ErrorKind::Dependency { .. } => (
+              "DEPENDENCY_FAILED".to_string(),
+              format!("Field '{}' is required when '{}' is present", missing_field, prop),
+            ),
+            ErrorKind::DependentRequired { .. } => (
+              "DEPENDENT_REQUIRED_MISSING".to_string(),
+              format!("Field '{}' is required when '{}' is present", missing_field, prop),
+            ),
+            _ => unreachable!(),
+          };
+          
+          errors_list.push(Error {
+            path: field_path,
+            code: error_code,
+            message: human_message,
+            cause: format!("property '{}' required, if '{}' property exists", missing_field, prop),
+          });
+        }
+      }
+      ErrorKind::AdditionalProperties { got } => {
+        // Create a separate error for each additional property that's not allowed
+        let base_path = error.instance_location.to_string();
+        for extra_prop in got {
+          let field_path = if base_path.is_empty() {
+            format!("/{}", extra_prop)
+          } else {
+            format!("{}/{}", base_path, extra_prop)
+          };
+          
+          errors_list.push(Error {
+            path: field_path,
+            code: "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(),
+            message: format!("Property '{}' is not allowed", extra_prop),
+            cause: format!("additionalProperty '{}' not allowed", extra_prop),
+          });
+        }
+      }
+      ErrorKind::Pattern { got, want } => {
+        // Special handling for pattern errors to include the pattern in the message
+        let display_value = if got.len() > 50 {
+          format!("{}...", &got[..50])
+        } else {
+          got.to_string()
+        };
+        
+        errors_list.push(Error {
+          path: error.instance_location.to_string(),
+          code: "PATTERN_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+          message: format!("Value does not match pattern: {}", want),
+          cause: format!("'{}' does not match pattern {}", display_value, want),
+        });
+      }
+      _ => {
+        // Handle all other error types normally
+        let original_message = format!("{}", error.kind);
+        let (error_code, human_message) = convert_error_kind(&error.kind);
+
+        errors_list.push(Error {
+          path: error.instance_location.to_string(),
+          code: error_code,
+          message: human_message,
+          cause: original_message,
+        });
+      }
+    }
   } else {
     // Recurse into causes
     for cause in &error.causes {
-      collect_validation_errors(cause, errors_list);
+      collect_errors(cause, errors_list);
     }
   }
 }
 
+// Convert ErrorKind to error code and human message
+fn convert_error_kind(kind: &ErrorKind) -> (String, String) {
+  match kind {
+    ErrorKind::Type { .. } => (
+      "TYPE_MISMATCH".to_string(),
+      "Field type does not match the expected type".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Required { .. } => (
+      "REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING".to_string(),
+      "Required field is missing".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::DependentRequired { .. } => (
+      "DEPENDENT_REQUIRED_MISSING".to_string(),
+      "Dependent required fields are missing".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Dependency { .. } => (
+      "DEPENDENCY_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Dependency requirement not met".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Enum { .. } => (
+      "ENUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is not one of the allowed options".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Const { .. } => (
+      "CONST_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match the required constant".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinLength { .. } => (
+      "MIN_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Field length is below the minimum required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxLength { .. } => (
+      "MAX_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Field length exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Pattern { .. } => (
+      "PATTERN_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match the required pattern".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Minimum { .. } => (
+      "MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is below the minimum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Maximum { .. } => (
+      "MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ExclusiveMinimum { .. } => (
+      "EXCLUSIVE_MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must be greater than the minimum".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ExclusiveMaximum { .. } => (
+      "EXCLUSIVE_MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must be less than the maximum".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MultipleOf { .. } => (
+      "MULTIPLE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value is not a multiple of the required factor".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinItems { .. } => (
+      "MIN_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array has fewer items than required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxItems { .. } => (
+      "MAX_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array has more items than allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::UniqueItems { .. } => (
+      "UNIQUE_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Array contains duplicate items".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinProperties { .. } => (
+      "MIN_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Object has fewer properties than required".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxProperties { .. } => (
+      "MAX_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Object has more properties than allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AdditionalProperties { .. } => (
+      "ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(),
+      "Object contains properties that are not allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AdditionalItems { .. } => (
+      "ADDITIONAL_ITEMS_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(),
+      "Array contains additional items that are not allowed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Format { want, .. } => (
+      "FORMAT_INVALID".to_string(),
+      format!("Invalid {} format", want),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::PropertyName { .. } => (
+      "INVALID_PROPERTY_NAME".to_string(),
+      "Property name is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Contains => (
+      "CONTAINS_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "No items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MinContains { .. } => (
+      "MIN_CONTAINS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Too few items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::MaxContains { .. } => (
+      "MAX_CONTAINS_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Too many items match the required schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentEncoding { .. } => (
+      "CONTENT_ENCODING_INVALID".to_string(),
+      "Content encoding is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentMediaType { .. } => (
+      "CONTENT_MEDIA_TYPE_INVALID".to_string(),
+      "Content media type is invalid".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::FalseSchema => (
+      "FALSE_SCHEMA".to_string(),
+      "Schema validation always fails".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Not => (
+      "NOT_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value matched a schema it should not match".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::RefCycle { .. } => (
+      "REFERENCE_CYCLE".to_string(),
+      "Schema contains a reference cycle".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Reference { .. } => (
+      "REFERENCE_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Reference validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::Schema { .. } => (
+      "SCHEMA_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Schema validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::ContentSchema => (
+      "CONTENT_SCHEMA_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Content schema validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    // These shouldn't appear as leaf errors due to is_structural check
+    ErrorKind::Group => (
+      "VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(),
+      "Validation failed".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AllOf => (
+      "ALL_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match all required schemas".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::AnyOf => (
+      "ANY_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value does not match any of the allowed schemas".to_string(),
+    ),
+    ErrorKind::OneOf(_) => (
+      "ONE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(),
+      "Value must match exactly one schema".to_string(),
+    ),
+  }
+}
+
+// Filter out FALSE_SCHEMA errors if there are other validation errors
+fn filter_false_schema_errors(errors: Vec<Value>) -> Vec<Value> {
+  // Check if there are any non-FALSE_SCHEMA errors
+  let has_non_false_schema = errors.iter().any(|e| {
+    e.get("code")
+      .and_then(|c| c.as_str())
+      .map(|code| code != "FALSE_SCHEMA")
+      .unwrap_or(false)
+  });
+  
+  if has_non_false_schema {
+    // Filter out FALSE_SCHEMA errors
+    errors.into_iter()
+      .filter(|e| {
+        e.get("code")
+          .and_then(|c| c.as_str())
+          .map(|code| code != "FALSE_SCHEMA")
+          .unwrap_or(true)
+      })
+      .collect()
+  } else {
+    // Keep all errors (they're all FALSE_SCHEMA)
+    errors
+  }
+}
+
 // Formats errors according to DropError structure
-fn format_drop_errors(raw_errors: Vec<(String, String, String)>, instance: &Value) -> Vec<Value> {
+fn format_errors(errors: Vec<Error>, instance: &Value, schema_id: &str) -> Vec<Value> {
-    use std::collections::HashMap;
+  // Deduplicate by instance_path and format as DropError
-    use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
+  let mut unique_errors: HashMap<String, Value> = HashMap::new();
-
+  for error in errors {
-    // We don't filter structural paths from instance paths anymore
+    if let Entry::Vacant(entry) = unique_errors.entry(error.path.clone()) {
-    // because instance paths shouldn't contain these segments anyway
+      // Extract the failing value from the instance
-    // The issue was likely with schema paths, not instance paths
+      let failing_value = extract_value_at_path(instance, &error.path);
-    let plausible_errors = raw_errors;
+      entry.insert(json!({
-
+          "code": error.code,
-    // 2. Deduplicate by instance_path and format as DropError
+          "message": error.message,
-    let mut unique_errors: HashMap<String, Value> = HashMap::new();
+          "details": {
-    for (instance_path, schema_path, message) in plausible_errors {
+              "path": error.path,
-        if let Entry::Vacant(entry) = unique_errors.entry(instance_path.clone()) {
+              "context": failing_value,
-            // Convert message to error code and make it human readable
+              "cause": error.cause,
-            let (code, human_message) = enhance_error_message(&message);
+              "schema": schema_id
-            
+          }
-            // Extract the failing value from the instance
+      }));
-            let failing_value = extract_value_at_path(instance, &instance_path);
-            
-            entry.insert(json!({
-                "code": code,
-                "message": human_message,
-                "details": {
-                    "path": schema_path,
-                    "context": json!({ 
-                        "instance_path": instance_path,
-                        "failing_value": failing_value
-                    }),
-                    "cause": message // Original error message
-                }
-            }));
-        }
     }
+  }
 
-    unique_errors.into_values().collect()
+  unique_errors.into_values().collect()
 }
 
 // Helper function to extract value at a JSON pointer path
 fn extract_value_at_path(instance: &Value, path: &str) -> Value {
-    let parts: Vec<&str> = path.split('/').filter(|s| !s.is_empty()).collect();
+  let parts: Vec<&str> = path.split('/').filter(|s| !s.is_empty()).collect();
-    let mut current = instance;
+  let mut current = instance;
-    
+
-    for part in parts {
+  for part in parts {
-        match current {
+    match current {
-            Value::Object(map) => {
+      Value::Object(map) => {
-                if let Some(value) = map.get(part) {
+        if let Some(value) = map.get(part) {
-                    current = value;
+          current = value;
-                } else {
+        } else {
-                    return Value::Null;
+          return Value::Null;
-                }
-            }
-            Value::Array(arr) => {
-                if let Ok(index) = part.parse::<usize>() {
-                    if let Some(value) = arr.get(index) {
-                        current = value;
-                    } else {
-                        return Value::Null;
-                    }
-                } else {
-                    return Value::Null;
-                }
-            }
-            _ => return Value::Null,
         }
+      }
+      Value::Array(arr) => {
+        if let Ok(index) = part.parse::<usize>() {
+          if let Some(value) = arr.get(index) {
+            current = value;
+          } else {
+            return Value::Null;
+          }
+        } else {
+          return Value::Null;
+        }
+      }
+      _ => return Value::Null,
     }
-    
+  }
-    current.clone()
-}
 
-// Helper to convert validation messages to error codes and human-readable messages
+  current.clone()
-fn enhance_error_message(message: &str) -> (String, String) {
-    // Match exact boon error message patterns
-    let trimmed = message.trim();
-    
-    if trimmed.contains("value must be one of") {
-        ("ENUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is not one of the allowed options".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("length must be >=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MIN_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Field length is below the minimum required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("length must be <=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MAX_LENGTH_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Field length exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be >=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is below the minimum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be <=") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value exceeds the maximum allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be >") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("EXCLUSIVE_MINIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must be greater than the minimum".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("must be <") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("EXCLUSIVE_MAXIMUM_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must be less than the maximum".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("does not match pattern") {
-        ("PATTERN_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match the required pattern".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("missing properties") {
-        ("REQUIRED_FIELD_MISSING".to_string(), 
-         "Required field is missing".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("want") && trimmed.contains("but got") {
-        ("TYPE_MISMATCH".to_string(), 
-         "Field type does not match the expected type".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.starts_with("value must be") && !trimmed.contains("one of") {
-        ("CONST_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match the required constant".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("is not valid") && trimmed.contains(":") {
-        ("FORMAT_INVALID".to_string(), 
-         extract_format_message(trimmed))
-    } else if trimmed.contains("items at") && trimmed.contains("are equal") {
-        ("UNIQUE_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array contains duplicate items".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("additionalProperties") && trimmed.contains("not allowed") {
-        ("ADDITIONAL_PROPERTIES_NOT_ALLOWED".to_string(), 
-         "Object contains properties that are not allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("is not multipleOf") {
-        ("MULTIPLE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value is not a multiple of the required factor".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("minimum") && trimmed.contains("properties required") {
-        ("MIN_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Object has fewer properties than required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("maximum") && trimmed.contains("properties required") {
-        ("MAX_PROPERTIES_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Object has more properties than allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("minimum") && trimmed.contains("items required") {
-        ("MIN_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array has fewer items than required".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("maximum") && trimmed.contains("items required") {
-        ("MAX_ITEMS_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Array has more items than allowed".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "false schema" {
-        ("FALSE_SCHEMA".to_string(), 
-         "Schema validation always fails".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "not failed" {
-        ("NOT_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value matched a schema it should not match".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "allOf failed" {
-        ("ALL_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match all required schemas".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "anyOf failed" {
-        ("ANY_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value does not match any of the allowed schemas".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed.contains("oneOf failed") {
-        ("ONE_OF_VIOLATED".to_string(), 
-         "Value must match exactly one schema".to_string())
-    } else if trimmed == "validation failed" {
-        ("VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(), 
-         "Validation failed".to_string())
-    } else {
-        // For any unmatched patterns, try to provide a generic human-readable message
-        // while preserving the original error in details.cause
-        ("VALIDATION_FAILED".to_string(), 
-         "Validation failed".to_string())
-    }
-}
-
-
-
-// Extract a better format message
-fn extract_format_message(message: &str) -> String {
-    if message.contains("date-time") {
-        "Invalid date-time format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("email") {
-        "Invalid email format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("uri") {
-        "Invalid URI format".to_string()
-    } else if message.contains("uuid") {
-        "Invalid UUID format".to_string()
-    } else {
-        "Invalid format".to_string()
-    }
 }
 
 #[pg_extern(strict, parallel_safe)]
@@ -347,7 +568,6 @@ pub mod pg_test {
   }
 }
 
-
 #[cfg(any(test, feature = "pg_test"))]
 #[pg_schema]
 mod tests {

version

@@ -1 +1 @@
-1.0.21
+1.0.28