94477b677d5beb3aa6a0432e58770f1e4ef1361a
An OPTIONAL forward polymorphic relation declared via `family` (e.g.
order.counterparty / invoice.counterparty) had its auto-generated type
bound `{alias}.{disc} IN (variations)` emitted into the PARENT row's
WHERE. When the relation is absent (NULL discriminator) the parent row
was wrongly excluded — a counterparty-less order/invoice returned
nothing instead of the row with `counterparty: null`.
Fix: in `compile_polymorphic_bounds`, make the forward-FK bound
NULL-tolerant (`(… IN (…) OR …_type IS NULL)`), gated on
`!r#type.relationship`:
- real entities get NULL-tolerance (the relation is an optional
attribute; an absent one must not drop the row — the inner CASE
already resolves it to NULL);
- edge entities (`relationship == true`, e.g. `contact`) keep the
bound EXACT, because there source_type/target_type *partition*
typed sub-collections (phone_numbers vs email_addresses) and a NULL
endpoint belongs to no partition.
Note: the `oneOf` path was already correct — it emits no parent bound
(resolves via CASE … ELSE NULL), so cross-family optional relations
already hydrate NULL-safely. Added a fixture case documenting that.
Tests (fixtures/queryer.json): case 15 (entity → NULL-tolerant),
cases 3/5/10 (contact edges → exact, unchanged), new case 16
(oneOf cross-family → no bound). Full suite green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
JSPG - JSON Schema Validation for PostgreSQL
Description
Languages
Rust
99.2%
Shell
0.8%